Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2023-11/User:Ioaxxere for admin: difference between revisions

From Wiktionary, the free dictionary
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Browse history interactively
← Go to previous editGo to next edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 25: Line 25:
#:::We tend to hand admin rights to just any active editor and that leads to some of the issues that we've had recently. And then, after one has become an admin, it becomes much harder to actually take any action against them if something goes wrong (ex: an admin making homophobic and racist comments, nothing came out of it). Thus, I've become much more cautious about admin votes, and I believe that others should be as well. [[User:AG202|AG202]] ([[User talk:AG202|talk]]) 15:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
#:::We tend to hand admin rights to just any active editor and that leads to some of the issues that we've had recently. And then, after one has become an admin, it becomes much harder to actually take any action against them if something goes wrong (ex: an admin making homophobic and racist comments, nothing came out of it). Thus, I've become much more cautious about admin votes, and I believe that others should be as well. [[User:AG202|AG202]] ([[User talk:AG202|talk]]) 15:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
# {{oppose}} I find AG202's reasoning persuasive. Like the last time I voted, I don't rule out a support vote in the future, but I'm not there right now. [[User:Megathonic|Megathonic]] ([[User talk:Megathonic|talk]]) 02:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
# {{oppose}} I find AG202's reasoning persuasive. Like the last time I voted, I don't rule out a support vote in the future, but I'm not there right now. [[User:Megathonic|Megathonic]] ([[User talk:Megathonic|talk]]) 02:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
# {{oppose}} [[Wiktionary:Votes/2023-07/Unblocking Wonderfool]]. [[User:Huhu9001|-- Huhu9001]] ([[User talk:Huhu9001|talk]]) 02:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)


==== Abstain ====
==== Abstain ====

Revision as of 02:52, 21 November 2023

User:Ioaxxere for admin

Nomination: I hereby nominate Ioaxxere (talk • contribs) as a local English Wiktionary Administrator.

Schedule:

Acceptance: Ioaxxere (talk) 15:30, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support

  1. Support This user has created numerous interesting and useful modern slang entries and has generally done a good job of closing requests - such good housekeeping is vital to declutter the community pages. --Overlordnat1 (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support I like Template:R:Urban Dictionary (only a bona fide descriptivist would make this) and other work. --Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, since no substantial arguments against have been presented. Allahverdi Verdizade (talk) 19:46, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose

  1. Oppose. For similar reasons in Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2023-02/User:Ioaxxere for admin. I don't feel that much has really changed since then. Some past interactions, especially over Discord, also concern me. The nominator has also only been here for less than a year. AG202 (talk) 18:39, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @AG202 My first edit was over 16 months ago... Ioaxxere (talk) 16:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ioaxxere? I know. I said the nominator (कालमैत्री) has only been here for less than a year. Please read what I say carefully. AG202 (talk) 17:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, you're right. Ioaxxere (talk) 17:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @AG202 Sure i am really lacking in many regards. But this argument is without any connection to why nominee should be supported or not. An unneeded remark, so to speak. कालमैत्री (talk) 14:50, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @कालमैत्री: The nominator definitely matters as well as seen by comments on the last vote. A nominator who hasn't even been here since the last vote for Ioaxxere to be admin started shows to me that they haven't been here long enough to really know how the project works. What even is the rationale? What has changed since the last admin vote? Why should they specifically be given admin rights? An active user who makes good edits and templates does not automatically make an admin. That's part of why I myself rejected a nomination last year.
    We tend to hand admin rights to just any active editor and that leads to some of the issues that we've had recently. And then, after one has become an admin, it becomes much harder to actually take any action against them if something goes wrong (ex: an admin making homophobic and racist comments, nothing came out of it). Thus, I've become much more cautious about admin votes, and I believe that others should be as well. AG202 (talk) 15:06, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose I find AG202's reasoning persuasive. Like the last time I voted, I don't rule out a support vote in the future, but I'm not there right now. Megathonic (talk) 02:33, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Wiktionary:Votes/2023-07/Unblocking Wonderfool. -- Huhu9001 (talk) 02:52, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abstain

  1. Abstain for the same reasons as last time. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes 15:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decision

Retrieved from "https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Wiktionary:Votes/sy-2023-11/User:Ioaxxere_for_admin&oldid=76741118"